|
![]() |
|
|
Family Career Art of Juggling Single Moms Dad's Voice News Health Bookshelf Recipes Sports Mom Archives Contact Us Discussion Lists Wisdom of Mothers Resources |
|
A Father's JournalMy Real BoyBy Forrest Seymour
Nancy's been reading a book on circumcision. In bed, of all
places. Clearly biased against the procedure, the book's preordained
conclusion is illustrated graphically. I can't look at the pictures, not
even a glance. Nancy's reading up to prepare for our son's inevitable
questions and consternation. At nine months now I'm used to his body and
all it's pudgy parts. I forget that he's the first in my family to be
uncut. Our obstetrician claims the local rate is about 50-50 now, half the
folks in our town electing to leave their sons whole. None the less, we
expect Jakey to feel the outsider due to his intactness. Seems a shame.
To date. what sets our son apart from his fellow babes is not his
genitalia, but his hair; long and dark, it looks the hair of a two year old,
but it's been his since birth. A while back I cut it for the first time
while he nursed and dozed. Carefully I clipped and trimmed the wispy
locks, clearing them from his eyes. He looked even older then, the uneven
thin ends giving way to thick bangs.
I thought then of the whole Samson and Delilah thing, the hair
equals power equation. There is something paradoxically appealing about
the archetype of a man deriving strength and authority from long hair,
while our culture typically delegates this feature to women. I think of
Delilah surreptitiously cutting Samson's hair, and his subsequent fall from
grace. (I know this story only from dim memories of the movie version with
Victor Mature as Samson, a role he must have felt destined for ever since
he took that name).
And I think of the struggles over male hair length that our culture
went through in the 60s and 70s. I myself wore my hair way long back then
well after it fell out of fashion. From time to time, it truly felt like a
radical, and sometimes dangerous, thing to do. I keep a tattered picture
ID card from those days and use it from time to time still, whenever I need
to buy credibility with skeptical teens. In these unfettered adolescent
minds, because I once wore my hair to the middle of my back, I have more
authority. See, the hair equal power equation still works.
Emily, our five year old, asked the other day why mensrooms don't
provide private stalls for the urinals. A brilliant question I'd never
thought to ask. "I don't know," I told her. "Ask the folks who build them."
Hey architects: Why aren't men afforded the same degree of privacy
for No. 1 one as No. 2? Is it just efficient use of space, or is
there some greater underlying meaning here? What about locker rooms?
Having spent little if any time in women's locker rooms, I cannot verify
this, but I recall from youth discussions with girls who swore that their
locker room had showers in stalls! We boys had to learn to shower naked
together from the word go. The story I hear is that women don't even walk
around naked in their locker rooms. What is the origin and purpose of this
discrepancy in our society's morés? Lately, when I go to our local gym, I've been experimenting with modesty. Rather than feel like I have to walk around from shower to locker swaying in the wind, I now wrap myself in a towel. This is liberating in a
strange sort of way. In the past I've felt that there was something
important about being naked with a bunch of guy's I don't know, though I've
never been exactly sure why. Men's locker rooms (like "mensrooms") are one
of the few places left where you can be pretty darn sure there are only
going to be other men about. A couple of times I've found myself in locker
rooms thickly populated with college or professional athletes, and this can
be a heady experience; the testosterone was practically palpable. Though
not small, I felt dwarfed by these walls of muscle and grit. It was both
frightening and comforting. So there is something powerful about this getting naked with
strangers thing, about group showers, about public urinals, about steamy
saunas packed with the first string. Call it gender bonding; we come to
feel fond and proud of our sex. Yes, that is the light side, Luke. Now it is time to look at the
dark side. By requiring these public displays of our bodies, our bodies become
in part public property. Feminists have long understood this. Like most
oppression of males this is hard to see because our society's oppression of
women is so obvious and omnipresent. But this form of male oppression is
no less insidious. It has to do with preparing men to protect the tribe, to become
warriors at a moment's notice, to give up their bodies to protect the
status quo. It is a constant threat in men's lives that they may be called
upon to fight, whether in a bar or in a war, often without notice. We prepare men to be warriors by mustering them like the military in gym class, so they get comfortable with following orders; by glorifying the culture of guns, so they won't hesitate to use them when asked; by
forcing them together at close quarters and naked, so the deprivations of
war will feel comfortable; by mocking them for their long or expressive
hair styles, to train them to conform; and by cutting of the tips of their
penises to demonstrate their subservience. I never said it was going to be
pretty, but these are some graphic illustrations of our society's purpose
that we must at least glance at from time to time. My Jake shows a certain tendency towards what a less careful observer might call typically boy behaviors. I know from watching girls
and boys that we all have the whole spectrum of both gender's attributes
within us. Boys may tend towards one general set of such behaviors, and
girls another, but this applies only to the whole; individuals can and do
exhibit it all from time to time. Still, a bit of biology and a large dose
of culture teach us early what feelings and behaviors are OK in public,
based on our genitals. As a parent to both genders, I'm happy at any opportunity to subvert
this dominant paradigm. I'm proud of my daughter when she is aggressive,
and tell her so; and I hope to feel the same when my son is gentle with his
friends. Still, I myself can feel pretty aggressive when I hear people speak
blithely of circumcision, when they mock a neo-punker's hairdo, when they
shake their head about a violent boy-kid and say smiling, "he's a real boy." "What about the rest of us?" I want to ask. "Will my son have to be violent to be considered a real boy? Will
he have to drive drunk to become a real man? Will he be forced to register
for the draft? Will he be mocked for being uncircumcised? For being
normal?" Yes, Grasshopper, it is true. These poor judgments will be made, and many more. Gentle boys are mutated by our bizarre culture into violent thugs every minute. As parents of these fragile flowers we must nurture
them with what we know to be healthy; love, pride, acceptance, an open
mind, and some shelter from the storms. I'm excited, and not a little
afraid, to learn who my baby-Jake blossoms into. And yet, whoever he
becomes, however odd, or normal, he will still always be my real boy.
Family | Career | Art of Juggling | Single Moms | Health
Copyright © 2000 Working Moms Refuge.
|